Risks Related to Our Competitive Position
Intensive competitive sector
We face significant competition for our drug discovery and development efforts, and if we do not compete effectively, our commercial opportunities will be reduced or eliminated.
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change and innovation. Our competitors may now or in the future develop drug products that render our products obsolete or non-competitive by developing more effective drugs or by developing their products more efficiently.
In addition, our ability to develop competitive products would be limited if our competitors succeeded in obtaining regulatory approvals for drug candidates more rapidly than we were able to or in obtaining patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limited our drug development efforts. We depend upon our Executive Committee and management to develop and successfully implement strategies for us to obtain regulatory approvals for our selected current and future (including acquired) product candidates more speedily than our competitors.
GLPG3667 faces significant competition in the field of dermatomyositis (DM) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE):
In the field of DM, physical therapy, exercise and medication including corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or recently immunoglobulin treatment are typically used to treat DM. Treatment of this disease has relied for many years on off-label medication. Additionally, in 2021 the FDA approved immunoglobulin treatment Octagam®, based on the Phase 3 ProDerm trial of Octapharma.
In the field of SLE, corticosteroids, antimalarials and immunosuppressants are commonly used to control lupus disease activity. Only two products are approved to treat SLE, both as add-on to standard therapy: Belimumab (Benlysta®) (anti-BAFF) from GSK and recently anifrolumab (Saphnelo®) (anti-IFN) from Astra Zeneca. There are currently over 10 products in Phase 3 development for SLE, of which the minority are oral – deucravacitinib (SotyktuTM) (TYK2) from BMS, upadacitinib (JAK) from Abbvie and cenerimod (S1P1) from Idorsia/Viatris.
Additionally, these third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, the development of our current and future (including acquired) product candidates. If we, our product candidates or our technology platforms do not compete effectively, it is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.